Delaware Supreme Court says Byju’s defaulted on $1.5 billion loan, favours US lenders, ET LegalWorld

The Delaware Supreme Court has upheld a previous ruling that edtech firm Byju’s had defaulted on a $1.5 billion loan.

As a result, the lenders can now demand full repayment, take control of Byju’s US entity (Byju’s Alpha Inc.), and appoint Timothy Pohl as its sole director, the US lenders said.

“This ruling confirms that Byju’s was in default, which both Byju Raveendran (founder) and Riju Ravindran personally acknowledged when they signed multiple amendments to the credit agreement on Byju’s behalf from October 2022 to January 2023,” the steering committee of the ad hoc group of term loan lenders to Byju’s Alpha, Inc said in a statement.

This is the second public statement from the lenders reinforcing that Byju’s and Raveendran must repay the outstanding loan.

According to the court, the edtech company must be held accountable for its financial defaults and cannot distance itself from conceding to those defaults and their consequences, the lenders said.

“Byju has attempted to concoct an alternate narrative that Byju’s did not default and to place the blame of the company’s failure on others rather than repay lenders money that is rightfully owed to us, including disclosing what happened to the $533 million of missing loan proceeds. It is his unreliable word against that of the highest court in the State of Delaware,” they added.

Earlier, the US lenders had said that the troubled edtech firm must repay the borrowed $1.2 billion along with interest. According to these lenders, Byju’s has not made any contractually due payment in more than 17 months.

On September 17, Glas Trust, the trustee for lenders to which Byju’s owes $1.2 billion, moved the Supreme Court challenging its removal from the committee of creditors (CoC) of the debt-ridden Think & Learn Pvt Ltd by the interim resolution professional (IRP). The US lender had also called for the removal of Pankaj Srivastava, the IRP of Think & Learn.

On September 3, Srivastava removed Glas Trust, noting that it did not represent the minimum 51% of lenders in the consortium that issued a $1.2 billion term loan to the company.

  • Published On Sep 24, 2024 at 10:41 AM IST

Join the community of 2M+ industry professionals

Subscribe to our newsletter to get latest insights & analysis.

Download ETLegalWorld App

  • Get Realtime updates
  • Save your favourite articles


Scan to download App


Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *